Thursday, November 5, 2009

We will not cut local aid (trust me)

I’ll have to file this in the “you can’t trust him as far as you can throw him” category. I know. I know. What in the world was I thinking, when Governor Deval Patrick said to a Worcester audience on October 29, 2009, “We will not cut local aid,” that he meant “We will not cut local aid?”

I even reported that he had made this commitment at our board of selectmen meeting last Thursday night. What a relief that the $600 million in cuts would not be on the backs of the towns and cities of the commonwealth.

Here’s Deval’s exact comment about local aid cuts: “We will not cut local aid. Local communities are the front line of both our economic and our social life and they are struggling as it is.”

On October 30th (the next day), he filed H4303, which includes local aid cuts and made requests to the legislature to cut PILOT funding and the Quinn Bill (both elements of local aid).

Dear Governor Patrick:

Local aid, as well as assessments, are reported to the towns and cities by the Department of Revenue via what is commonly called the Cherry Sheet. The Cherry Sheet even has its own 56-page manual called the Cherry Sheet Manual. So far, so good.

From page three of the Cherry Sheet Manual:

Named for the cherry-colored paper on which it was originally printed, the Cherry Sheet is the official notification from the Commissioner of Revenue of the upcoming fiscal year’s state aid and assessments to cities, towns and regional school districts.

When you say “local aid,” that means the stuff listed on the Cherry Sheet. Everyone, except you, seems to know this.

For reference, we’ll use the Town of Sandwich’s fiscal year 2010 Cherry Sheet.

Now let’s look at some of the cuts you’re proposing:

1) 50% reduction of Quinn Bill payments – That would be Line 4 under Section B of the Cherry Sheet (aka “local aid”).

2) 39% reduction of PILOT – PILOT stands for payments in lieu of taxes. In this case, it refers to the payments made by the state to cities and towns that host state-owned property. Here in Sandwich, we have quite a bit of state-owned land, the biggest piece of it being the Massachusetts Military Reservation. We were scheduled to receive $551,137 of PILOT. A 39% reduction would correlate to about $215,000. Now, let’s see… Is that on the Cherry Sheet? Yes. Here it is. Line 8 under Section B.

3) You want to cut budget line 7000-9501, Public Libraries Local Aid, by $284,000 (statewide). Do I even need to bother to see if Public Libraries Local Aid might, in fact, be considered local aid? Just so you know, it’s Line 9 under Section B.

4) It gets better. Next, you want to shave $5,174,307 off the Charter School Reimbursement budget line item (7061-9010). You know what’s coming next. There it is. Line 4 under Section A of our Cherry Sheet.

5) Finally, you’re going to lop $18 million off the Regional School Districts Transportation budget (7035-0006). Well, guess what? Sandwich and four other towns pay for Upper Cape Tech, so where do you think the school is going to be forced to go to make up for their transportation budget shortfall? Really. Do I need to answer the question for you?

So, Governor, when you said “We will not cut local aid,” what did you think you were saying? Are you and your staff so unfamiliar with how our budgets work that you didn’t realize that these are all local aid accounts? Or did you think that we wouldn’t notice?

It’s incredible that we can’t trust even the simplest, most straight-forward things that you say. (I’m shaking my head.)

Sincerely,

Incredulous and Stunned in Sandwich


Here’s a fuller analysis of the governor’s proposed cuts: H4303 – Governor’s FY10 Fiscal Solutions Supp

Copyright 2009 Randy Hunt

4 comments:

  1. Duval must also not have been watching the television Tuesday evening.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rather than giving the Governor additional power to cut education, public safety and human service spending even further, I would suggest the Legislature and Governor put aside the usual political rhetoric regarding taxes and reform and embrace some real cost savings.

    For the Governor to now say he is not cutting local aid it simply untrue. He will surely pay a price at the ballot box in 2010.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You can trust me.....I am not like the others. uuummm, you, sir, are worse.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would like to ask a question to anonymous who posted on 11/6. Did not another politician say he was different, but ended up being worse?

    Obama is a far greater problem than our governor.
    We should get rid of both.

    Char Broiled, medium rare

    ReplyDelete

I monitor all comments. As long as there are no personally defamatory statements and/or foul language, I'll post your comment. For this reason, your comment will not appear instantaneously. To comment without registering, choose Name/URL and type a screen name (or your real name if you like) into the Name field. Leave the URL field blank.